Mnangagwa’s Tariff Suspension Screams ‘Double Standards’

April 7, 2025
1x 1 | Report Focus News
1x 1

HARARE- Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa recently announced the suspension of all tariffs on US imports, aiming to improve trade relations between the two countries. However, this move comes in stark contrast to his recent statements accusing the United States of consolidating military bases in neighboring Zambia.

Mnangagwa’s call for enhanced relations with the US through tariff suspension appears contradictory given his criticisms of American influence in the region. During a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Mnangagwa accused the US of using Zambia as a base for military power to isolate Zimbabwe. He expressed concern over the growing US presence in Zambia, suggesting it as part of a strategy to undermine Zimbabwe’s sovereignty.

This reflects a clear double standard in Zimbabwe’s foreign policy. While Mnangagwa seeks to benefit economically from better ties with the US, he simultaneously criticizes the very same power for strengthening its influence in the region. The suspension of tariffs on US goods, intended to foster trade relations, contrasts with his broader geopolitical stance, which views the US as a threat to Zimbabwe’s regional standing.

The contradictions in Mnangagwa’s approach are evident in his balancing act between benefiting from economic ties with the US and resisting perceived Western interference. On one hand, he seeks to use US trade opportunities to stimulate Zimbabwe’s economy, while on the other, he portrays the US as a regional antagonist through accusations of military expansion. This stance underscores the difficulty Zimbabwe faces in reconciling its need for trade with its ideological resistance to Western influence. It also raises questions about the sincerity of Mnangagwa’s diplomatic efforts, as he attempts to navigate international relations while maintaining a narrative of sovereignty and resistance to Western powers.

Moreover, Mnangagwa’s outreach to Russia for defense and food security assistance adds to the complexity of this move. While he criticizes the US, he simultaneously courts another global power with its own interests in the region. This reflects an attempt to balance both economic cooperation with the West and strategic alignment with non-Western powers, showcasing the inconsistent and pragmatic nature of Zimbabwe’s foreign policy under Mnangagwa.